Wednesday, 26 October 2016

They Are Ahead By a Century

The Tragically Hip have always been one of "Canada's bands". They have toured Canada, donated money from their shows back into Canadian cities, sang about national issues, and have entertained us for decades. This is why the recent news about Gord Downie was so heart breaking. Gord Downie, the lead singer for the Hip, was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer. Tears were shed, people were shocked, and Canada stood still for a second wondering what would happen to Gord and the band.

What has happened in the months after the announcement of the diagnosis reflects how important the Tragically Hip are to Canada. It was amazing to see how Canada rallied around Gord Downie and the band. They announced a summer (final) tour, and tickets did not last long. For weeks it seemed that everyone wanted to talk about the Tragically Hip. The way Canadian news stations presented stories on the Tragically Hip's final tour relate to the agenda-setting effect highlighted in the textbook. The agenda-setting effect is "The ability of the mass media to transfer the salience of items and their attributes from the news agenda to the public." (Sullivan, 2013, 70). Whether it was Global news covering stories from shows across the tour, CTV covering news from ticket sales, or CBC broadcasting the Kingston concert live and advertisement free. It was evident that the Tragically Hip were being framed as a popular Canadian interest. And rightfully so in my opinion! Even the Aboriginal Peoples Television Network has a "Tragically Hip archive" section on their website. This shows how diverse the Tragically Hip's audience is since Canadian Aboriginal's values are traditionally different from the majority of Canadian society and are more collectivistic.

Image result for gord downie foundationThe rest of this blog will be focusing on the Kingston concert. One takeaway from the concert was the lack of advertisements. This is significant when looking at Dallas Smythe's idea of the audience commodity. This is when viewers "become a new product that media corporations (can) sell to advertisers" (Sullivan, 2013, 81). CBC's broadcast aired commercial free because they believed it was the right thing to do. Does this mean that the audience was not viewed as a commodity for advertisers? Possibly, but that does not eliminate the idea of audiences being a commodity in other ways. For instance, they could still be viewed as a commodity for merchandisers. There are always trinkets, clothing, or memorabilia available for people to buy at concerts. However, the main point of emphasis in regard to the transfer of money between advertiser and consumer during the event was when the CBC selflessly encouraged their audience to donate to the Gord Downie Foundation for Brain Cancer Research. The audience could be viewed as a "commodity" in that sense, but it is promoting a very good cause that will aid a significant amount of people in the future. (The shirt says "brain cancer awareness")

Another noteworthy part of the Hip's final concert was when Gord Downie referenced how Canada has treated their Aboriginal population.

"He cares about the people way up north that we were trained our entire lives to ignore. Trained our entire lives to hear not a word of what's goin' on up there, and what's goin' on up there ain't good."
-Gord Downie

This powerful statement from Gord Downie references the spiral of silence that has been going on in Canada for almost a century. Spiral of Silence Theory "claims that individuals naturally fear social isolation and will therefore monitor the political views expressed in the media and repress their own opinions if they are in the minority." (Sullivan, 2013, 71). For decades now it has been socially acceptable to state how unfair Canada has treated their Aboriginal population, but not much progress has been made in fixing the situation. It has come to the point where people do not express these ideologies as frequently as they should be if they want things to change. Media coverage on Canada's Aboriginal population on our news networks is uncommon and it often does not display their cultural values. If you want to gain a better perspective on Aboriginal cultures and values, you should watch the Aboriginal Peoples Television Network. However, this is not mainstream media, and it appears that the ideology of "Aboriginals have been unfairly treated by Canada" has either been suppressed or become unpopular. This is evident when you look at the dominant discourses of our society. This example also relates to the agenda-setting effect. Canadian news networks have come under fire for the lack of coverage on Aboriginal stories. A small sample from "Buried Voices, Media Coverage of Aboriginal Issues in Ontario" displays that there were 3,338 Aboriginal stories and 725,827 total stories in Ontario media from 2012-2013. (Pierro, R, Barrera, J, Blackstock, C, Harding, R, McCue, D, & Metatawabin, M. 2013).
Further reading: http://www.jhr.ca/en/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Buried_Voices.pdf

The Hip's Kingston concert was viewed/listened by 11.7 million people according to the CBC. In lecture, we talked about why we should quantify an audience. One reason is numbers are easy to understand. It is clear that the impact the Tragically Hip have/had on Canadians is significant due to the amount of people tuning in to their final performance. However, numbers do not tell us why those individuals chose to tune in to the concert. Uses and Gratifications Theory studies why people chose certain media to fulfill their needs. U&G Theory acknowledges that "Audience members actively choose media channels and content to suit their own needs at a particular moment." (Sullivan, 2013, 113). When it comes to the Hip's concert in Kingston, there are numerous reasons why audiences chose to view/listen to the concert. For instance, as previously stated, The Tragically Hip are one of "Canada's bands", and Canadians are proud to say that. Citizens may have tuned in merely to pay respect to the band and acknowledge that they are important to Canada. My dad fell into that category. Also, a more shared need from viewers was the need to hear them perform live one more time. Whether it was watching them on TV, listening through the radio, or streaming it via CBC, it is clear that the live performance had a significant impact on many people in different ways. The multitude of ways to interact with the content relate to the concept of "Modality-based Gratifications" brought up in "Uses and Grats 2.0: New Gratifications for New Media". The authors state that "Modality refers to the different methods of presentation (e.g., audio or pictures) of media content, appealing to different aspects of the human perceptual system (e.g., hearing, seeing)." (Sundar, S & Limperos, A. 2013). This is interesting when looking at how many ways audiences could view or listen to the concert. I personally listened to the concert in the car via the radio, and watched it on TV when there was a television available. I felt more in tune with the music in the car because that was all I could focus on, but I felt more connected with The Tragically Hip when I watched the concert live on TV.

Finally, I would like to talk about why I tuned in to The Tragically Hip's Kingston concert. To be honest, if you asked me a week before the concert what my favourite Hip song was, I would not be able to answer you. I knew absolutely nothing about the band, but I knew how important they were to Canada's culture based on people reacted to the news about Gord Downie. The concert was important to me because I felt that I should learn more about the band considering how important they are to Canada. I definitely fell victim to the bandwagon effect, but I wanted to be part of the Hip's audience at least once so I could witness why they are so special. I definitely satisfied my need for learning more about the Hip, and throughout the show I recognized songs that I had heard when I was a kid, but I never knew the Tragically Hip sang them. Their lyrics spoke about Canada and Canadian issues (past and present). Whether it was Wheat King's message about the wrongful conviction of David Milgaard, or the tale of Bill Barilko. It was easy to see just how much the country influenced their music, and in return, how much The Tragically Hip influenced Canada.

Take it away Gord!

References:
Sundar, S. & Limperos, A. (2013). "Uses and Grats 2.0: News Gratifications for New Media." Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media. 57(4), 504-525

Sullivan, J. (2013). Media Audiences: Effects, users, institutions and power. Sage Publications Inc., New York, NY.

Pierro, R, Barrera, J, Blackstock, C, Harding, R, McCue, D, & Metatawabin, M. 2013 Buried Voices, Media Coverage of Aboriginal Issues in Ontario".
From: http://www.jhr.ca/en/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Buried_Voices.pdf












Wednesday, 5 October 2016

Comm 3p19 Blog Entry 1- Drew Meyer

One of the most interesting phenomena in the realm of audience studies is sports fandom. The activities fans get involved in may seem strange or even borderline crazy to outsiders who are not as involved in sports. Whether fans are painting their face (or even body) a certain colour to display who they are cheering for, or they are furiously screaming at their television set over a missed call by a referee, the audience involvement in the realm of sports crosses all borders and generations. In this blog, I will be looking at sports audiences and how they immerse themselves in audience activities. Also, I will discuss how social media has affected sports communities. The blog will look exclusively at NFL audiences, and my favourite team, the Buffalo Bills.

It is always encouraging to see fans of certain teams band together. However, it does not end at just going to the stadium or arena. Fans gather around their television sets, at local bars, and even on social media! There are numerous ways to connect with people who share a love for the same team you do. The textbook brings up the idea of audience members acting as "free agents" when selecting media. "Audience members are regarded to be reflexive about their own media use - selecting specific media and content to fit their own needs and desires" (Sullivan, 2013, p.8). One way I personally fit into this model presented in the chapter is when I watch Buffalo Bills' football games. I purposely select the local television station to watch the game because the announcers know more about the team. Their opinions on the team are slightly more informed than the broadcasters on a separate channel. I feel as though I am more connected to the team when I am listening to the broadcasters who know about the Buffalo Bills. The idea of being a "free agent" is particularly unique and interesting when looking at the sports world considering "Free Agent Frenzy" is part of every major North American sports organization. Athletes who are not currently under contract are free to choose any new team to play for. Which is similar to how each individual is able to choose which media they want to engage with. Also, the multiple options available for individuals to watch their team(s) mean a wide range of audience members can be involved with the game.

One major research question I consider when looking at the abundance of options available for viewing sports programs is how audience member's experiences differ in different locations. For instance, how does experiencing a sporting event on a mobile device differ from someone watching that same event at a local bar? Also, you can even compare these mediums to the live stadium environment. You'll find that people experience the same media in different ways, but they may obtain the same level of enjoyment from it.
 
From: http://www.nybooks.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/first-debate-pool.jpg
Professor Good referenced this picture in lecture (September 29th, 2016) and I think that it relates well to what I am talking about. The man playing pool is not as engaged with the Presidential debate as someone who is actively watching it. Is his audience experience hindered because of this? Or, is the social aspect of being with friends and occasionally listening to the debate enhancing his experience? Also we should consider whether he cares more about Monday Night Football over the debate because both appear to be on. One way to obtain a somewhat clearer idea on this issue is to interview people at different establishments (e.g, bars, stadiums, and people on the street who claim they watch most of their sports content privately) and note how they experience sporting events and what makes them choose the establishment that they go to. The textbook discusses different kinds of surveys in order to gauge public opinion. The survey that would provide the most effective information in this scenario would be person-to-person interviews because a variety of opinions can be obtained from the people that were surveyed. A person-to-person interview is when "the researcher sits down with a respondent, establishes a rapport, and asks in-depth questions." (Sullivan, 2013, p.64). Obviously a bulk of information would not be obtained because it would be too time consuming, but talking to individuals at different venues experiencing the same media would provide some insight into why they choose to experience the sports event there.

Next, I would like to refer to this unique mashup of audience experiences.
Here you can see an abundance of rather interesting ways to display support for a team (in this case the Buffalo Bills). It is quite obvious that a fair few of these fans are under the influence of alcohol or other substances. Some actions such as body slamming others into tables, jumping off an RV onto a table, (possibly drunken) sparring between fans, and the guy plowing his head into an RV can lead to moderate or even serious injury. The actions from these fans resemble early 19th century audiences when audiences were described as "crowds". "The audience as 'crowd' referred to working-class commoners who came together at specific times and places to experience some for of routinized behavior." (Sullivan, 2013, p. 13). "Drunkenness, unruliness, and a lack of deference to hereditary rulers was tolerated for brief periods of time." (Sullivan, 2013, p. 13). However, most of these fans are regular people with jobs who just like to party during their free time. It is amazing to see what people do in social gatherings when rules are (to an extent) thrown out the window. What they are doing is indeed normal for some fans. They get drunk, get wild, and then they watch football. An outsider to this subculture may characterize these fans as "unruly", and it brings up the concept of "moral panics", which was mentioned by Stanley Cohen in the text. Moral panics "describe very strong negative public reactions to the spread of new social behavior." (Sullivan, 2013, p. 29). Even though I understand why people would be relatively unnerved by these types of audience behaviours, what they have to realize is that people have engaged in these types of behaviours for centuries. At the end of the day, all they are there to do is have fun and be a part of the Buffalo Bills' audience. Of course some people go a little bit too far, but no one is perfect. Finally, I know I should not have to point this out, but I feel as though I have to anyway. These fans do not represent ALL BILLS FANS OR ALL SPORTS FANS. Some people tend to stereotype an entire group of sports fans based on the actions of a few individuals.

The final points I would like to discuss are how audiences engage in social media to enhance their audience involvement in sport, and how watching sports has evolved beyond the stadium and the home television set. Sports organizations have a huge impact on social media platforms. To put this into perspective, the NFL Facebook account has 14.7 million likes, the NHL Facebook page has 4.2 million likes, the NBA Facebook page has 31.3 million likes, and the MLB Facebook page has 6.6 million likes. Not to mention the millions of twitter followers each league has. These platforms are significant for audiences because the ability to connect with other people who care about your favourite sports team is now easier than ever. All you have to do is connect with people on social media sites that you are more than likely already apart of. Here you really see the transformation of audiences. We have moved from gathering in physical spaces, to gathering together online. Even if we are in different countries! Each subsection of the four major north american sports organizations (e.g, each team that makes up each league) carries a unique and diverse community with it. Each sports team carries with it a discourse of the day. Whether they are discussing injuries, player transactions, excitement for the upcoming game, or anything in between, the community aspect of the sports page brings in heaps of people. What social media has done to sports audiences is provide audiences with a more efficient way to interact with each other and with the sports team. Each platform represents a new way audiences can interact and communicate with each other. Ideas, information, and news about sports gain recognition from fans very quickly when the news is shared on various social media platforms.

One major example of how sports audiences have evolved with the times is the NFL recognizing that a good percentage of their market livestreams their content. The NFL conducted an experiment last year when the Buffalo Bills played the Jacksonville Jaguars in England. They partnered with Twitter and Twitter streamed the game live so people around the world could watch the game. The numbers state that "Football fans streamed over 480 million minutes of the game, with 33% of streams coming in internationally, across 185 countries worldwide." ("National Football League Announce Streaming Partnership for Thursday Night Football" From: https://nflcommunications.com/Pages/National-Football-League-and-Twitter-Announce-Streaming-Partnership-for-Thursday-Night-Football.aspx). After seeing the success of the broadcast, the NFL realized that they should provide a service for the audience members who like to stream games because there are always people who either do not have access to a certain game, or are constantly on the move. They decided this year to partner with Twitter again in order to livestream every Thursday Night Football game. This move shifts the league into the 21st century and has enabled the expansion of broadcasting content beyond the television set. Audiences can now truly be anywhere at any time when they stream content.    


Before I go, please watch Ben Affleck's reaction to the BILLS BEATING THE PATRIOTS!!!! OH YEAH, GO BUFFALO!!!!!!!!!

References

National Football League Announce Streaming Partnership for Thursday Night Football" From: https://nflcommunications.com/Pages/National-Football-League-and-Twitter-Announce-Streaming-Partnership-for-Thursday-Night-Football.aspx

Sullivan, J. (2013). "Media Audiences: Effects, users, institutions and power." Sage Publications Inc., New York, NY.